Michelin Vierseizoenenbanden CrossClimate+ 165/70R14 XL 85T
Plus- en minpunten
door onze specialisten
De Michelin CrossClimate+ 165/70 R14 85T XL staat bekend als een zeer veilige allseasonband met sterke prestaties op droog en nat wegdek. Tests en klantreviews benadrukken de korte remweg en stabiele wegligging op droog asfalt, gecombineerd met betrouwbare grip in de regen. De band is 3PMSF-gecertificeerd, waardoor hij ook officieel voor wintergebruik is goedgekeurd en in sneeuw duidelijk beter presteert dan een gewone zomerband. Veel rijders prijzen bovendien het comfort, het relatief lage geluidsniveau en de lange levensduur voor een vierseizoenenband. Tegelijk laten recente bandentests zien dat de remweg op nat wegdek inmiddels slechts gemiddeld is ten opzichte van de nieuwste concurrenten, en de prijs ligt hoger dan die van veel andere allseasonopties. In echt zware sneeuw en bergachtige omstandigheden blijft een volwaardige winterband sterker. Voor bestuurders die vooral in gematigde klimaten rijden en één band voor het hele jaar zoeken, biedt deze CrossClimate+ echter een aantrekkelijk compromis tussen veiligheid, comfort en levensduur.
Reviews van Michelin Vierseizoenenbanden CrossClimate+ 165/70R14 XL 85T
Gebaseerd op 51 reviews
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22 oktober 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 april 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 april 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 januari 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 januari 2021
